V2EX = way to explore
V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方
现在注册
已注册用户请  登录
honk
V2EX  ›  DNS

IBM 也推公共 DNS 9.9.9.9

  •  1
     
  •   honk · 2017-11-20 10:34:46 +08:00 · 15594 次点击
    这是一个创建于 2559 天前的主题,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
    72 条回复    2018-02-01 11:54:58 +08:00
    dyy1997
        1
    dyy1997  
       2017-11-20 10:52:30 +08:00
    <blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="a/Yn45M"><a href="//imgur.com/Yn45M"></a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
    长城阵亡
    dyy1997
        2
    dyy1997  
       2017-11-20 10:53:49 +08:00
    <a href="https://imgur.com/LJwyFGm"><img src="" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    hugsky
        3
    hugsky  
       2017-11-20 10:55:17 +08:00
    Troevil
        4
    Troevil  
       2017-11-20 10:55:53 +08:00
    9.9.9.9
    9.9.9.10
    killadm
        5
    killadm  
       2017-11-20 10:59:17 +08:00
    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 271ms,最长 = 272ms,平均 = 271ms

    延迟很高
    kttde
        6
    kttde  
       2017-11-20 10:59:32 +08:00
    如果支持非 53 端口就还不错
    janus77
        7
    janus77  
       2017-11-20 11:00:21 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=163ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=160ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=162ms TTL=49
    请求超时。

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 160ms,最长 = 163ms,平均 = 161ms
    FONG2
        8
    FONG2  
       2017-11-20 11:22:57 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=221ms TTL=52
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=52

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 219ms,最长 = 221ms,平均 = 220ms
    fruitscandy
        9
    fruitscandy  
       2017-11-20 11:25:22 +08:00
    Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51

    Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 77ms
    CEBBCAT
        10
    CEBBCAT  
       2017-11-20 11:28:02 +08:00 via Android
    好像是有恶意网站过滤,这是不是也算是污染了?
    sikariba
        11
    sikariba  
       2017-11-20 11:30:42 +08:00
    确实延时很高,我的也 200+ms
    windirt
        12
    windirt  
       2017-11-20 12:09:50 +08:00
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=247.287 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=224.672 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=221.834 ms

    PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=260.780 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=282.291 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=301.803 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=230.136 ms
    huanxianghao
        13
    huanxianghao  
       2017-11-20 12:12:25 +08:00
    延迟很高,深圳电信有 230 左右
    ashfinal
        14
    ashfinal  
       2017-11-20 12:16:43 +08:00
    ~ % Ping 9.9.9.9
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=122.878 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=122.023 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=122.914 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=234.114 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=126.519 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=44 time=123.828 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=44 time=136.924 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 122.023/141.314/234.114/38.184 ms
    zane1994
        15
    zane1994  
       2017-11-20 12:45:06 +08:00 via iPhone
    还没有在中国加节点,所以现在并没有什么用
    pq
        16
    pq  
       2017-11-20 12:55:34 +08:00
    @Troevil 我觉得应该学 Google,主辅的 ip 有一种对称美感:
    主:9.9.9.9
    辅:9.9.6.6
    laudukang
        17
    laudukang  
       2017-11-20 12:56:53 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=277ms TTL=55
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=270ms TTL=55
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=55
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=304ms TTL=55

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 270ms,最长 = 304ms,平均 = 286ms


    正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=28ms TTL=44
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=25ms TTL=44
    请求超时。
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=34ms TTL=44

    8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 25ms,最长 = 34ms,平均 = 29ms
    matolv
        18
    matolv  
       2017-11-20 12:59:11 +08:00
    上海联通 ping 正好 100,不丢包,8.8.8.8 是 200,丢包率 50%
    @pq 为什么不是 6.9.6.9
    shingoxray
        19
    shingoxray  
       2017-11-20 12:59:46 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 76ms,最长 = 76ms,平均 = 76ms

    正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=83ms TTL=50
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=84ms TTL=50
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=84ms TTL=50
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=83ms TTL=50

    8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 83ms,最长 = 84ms,平均 = 83ms
    roychan
        20
    roychan  
       2017-11-20 13:03:14 +08:00
    我准备推出一下 0.0.0.0。
    ihainan
        21
    ihainan  
       2017-11-20 13:08:26 +08:00
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=53.8 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=55.5 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=54.6 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=53.7 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=53.7 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=54.5 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=54.8 ms
    cooLepus
        22
    cooLepus  
       2017-11-20 13:11:09 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 197ms,最长 = 197ms,平均 = 197ms

    正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44
    来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44

    8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 21ms,最长 = 21ms,平均 = 21ms

    广州电信
    niceworld
        23
    niceworld  
       2017-11-20 13:11:40 +08:00   ❤️ 3
    @roychan 真正的 0 延迟,无论您在世界的任何一个角落,都能享受到高度可定制化与无延迟的 DNS 服务。 🐶
    scriptB0y
        24
    scriptB0y  
       2017-11-20 13:21:17 +08:00
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=68.918 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=67.911 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=69.325 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=67.352 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=69.292 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=68.051 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=68.397 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=67.392 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=67.974 ms
    joy281
        25
    joy281  
       2017-11-20 13:27:48 +08:00
    > ping 9.9.9.9

    Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=54
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 49ms, Maximum = 57ms, Average = 51ms
    DOLLOR
        26
    DOLLOR  
       2017-11-20 13:35:48 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=283ms TTL=50
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=285ms TTL=50
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=289ms TTL=50
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=284ms TTL=50

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 283ms,最长 = 289ms,平均 = 285ms

    这延迟确实惨不忍睹
    wclebb
        27
    wclebb  
       2017-11-20 14:03:00 +08:00
    211ms
    raysonx
        28
    raysonx  
       2017-11-20 14:10:50 +08:00   ❤️ 1
    北京联通,ping 不通。
    路由追踪结果显示空路由:
    Packets Pings
    Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1. 192.168.1.1 0.0% 6 6.6 8.9 1.8 22.3 8.4
    2. 221.223.*.* 0.0% 6 10.7 15.4 6.8 32.3 9.8
    3. 61.148.174.53 0.0% 6 24.3 8.7 4.9 24.3 7.6
    4. 61.51.114.189 66.7% 6 7.9 8.3 7.9 8.8 0.0
    5. 124.65.194.157 33.3% 6 4.1 22.4 4.1 72.7 33.6
    6. 219.158.5.150 0.0% 6 6.8 11.7 6.8 16.4 3.0
    7. 219.158.3.178 0.0% 6 8.2 10.4 6.5 15.9 3.5
    8. ???
    chanssl
        29
    chanssl  
       2017-11-20 14:26:42 +08:00
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    119 packets transmitted, 101 received, 15% packet loss, time 117996ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.031/193.450/277.754/33.227 ms

    --- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics ---
    114 packets transmitted, 104 received, 8% packet loss, time 113047ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 150.006/200.296/278.582/39.471 ms
    UnderTakerMS
        30
    UnderTakerMS  
       2017-11-20 14:28:12 +08:00
    根据站长之家的测试评论访问时间在 200ms 以上
    funnypc
        31
    funnypc  
       2017-11-20 17:56:28 +08:00 via Android
    ping 10.10.10.10 延迟 0.014ms

    very proud😚 #好吧内网不算
    -- from https://t.co/5iNqIDY32g
    datou
        32
    datou  
       2017-11-20 18:06:53 +08:00
    @raysonx 你被特别关注了吧?

    Northn
        33
    Northn  
       2017-11-20 18:14:29 +08:00
    WAITUNG
        34
    WAITUNG  
       2017-11-20 18:24:29 +08:00
    190ms
    flyingghost
        35
    flyingghost  
       2017-11-20 18:29:18 +08:00
    魔都电信
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 67.873/74.915/127.671/14.395 ms
    --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
    21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 63.755/64.835/66.484/0.835 ms
    v2eros
        36
    v2eros  
       2017-11-20 18:55:50 +08:00
    太高了,250-350 之间
    Lxxyx
        37
    Lxxyx  
       2017-11-20 18:57:21 +08:00
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=414.808 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=333.716 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=355.080 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=378.428 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=402.134 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 333.716/376.833/414.808/29.722 ms
    ghostsf
        38
    ghostsf  
       2017-11-20 18:58:47 +08:00 via Android
    延迟有点高
    Kimyx
        39
    Kimyx  
       2017-11-20 19:27:11 +08:00
    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 73,已接收 = 73,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 202ms,最长 = 209ms,平均 = 204ms
    jiangzhuo
        40
    jiangzhuo  
       2017-11-20 19:54:32 +08:00
    我准备推出 10.10.10.10
    hfenger
        41
    hfenger  
       2017-11-20 20:36:32 +08:00
    海外
    ......
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 10,已接收 = 10,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 42ms,最长 = 42ms,平均 = 42ms

    北京
    ......
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=204ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=194ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=199ms TTL=49

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 24,已接收 = 24,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 175ms,最长 = 204ms,平均 = 181ms
    crystone
        42
    crystone  
       2017-11-20 20:39:52 +08:00
    你们试一下 10.10.10.10
    powergx
        43
    powergx  
       2017-11-20 21:02:20 +08:00
    dig google.com @9.9.9.9

    ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> google.com @9.9.9.9
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 57060
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;google.com. IN A

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.138
    google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.102
    google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.139
    google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.113
    google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.100
    google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.101

    ;; Query time: 168 msec
    ;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9)
    ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 20 21:01:23 2017
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 124
    erlinux
        44
    erlinux  
       2017-11-20 21:20:53 +08:00
    上海移动

    Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=54
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=186ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 180ms, Maximum = 186ms, Average = 182ms
    beautifultable
        45
    beautifultable  
       2017-11-20 21:25:32 +08:00
    ping 9.9.9.9
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=91.484 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=92.072 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=91.556 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=91.779 ms

    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 91.484/91.723/92.072/0.229 ms
    testcaoy7
        46
    testcaoy7  
       2017-11-20 21:42:05 +08:00 via Android
    我这边延迟 63 毫秒
    jimzhong
        47
    jimzhong  
       2017-11-20 21:55:01 +08:00
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=21.4 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=16.7 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=19.0 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=21.8 ms
    dot
        48
    dot  
       2017-11-20 21:59:43 +08:00 via Android
    没有 anycast,靓号也没用吧……
    vimutt
        49
    vimutt  
       2017-11-20 22:22:04 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 142ms,最长 = 142ms,平均 = 142ms
    xern
        50
    xern  
       2017-11-20 22:27:42 +08:00 via Android
    台湾 中华电信
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=107.505 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=106.888 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=107.236 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=107.872 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=106.775 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=107.330 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=107.017 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 106.775/107.232/107.872/0.352 ms
    cloverzrg2
        51
    cloverzrg2  
       2017-11-20 22:36:14 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    请求超时。
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 333ms,最长 = 333ms,平均 = 333ms
    fanyuxi
        52
    fanyuxi  
       2017-11-20 23:12:47 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=243ms TTL=53
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=265ms TTL=53
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=256ms TTL=53
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=275ms TTL=53

    9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 243ms,最长 = 275ms,平均 = 259ms
    hallomou
        53
    hallomou  
       2017-11-20 23:24:43 +08:00
    Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=56
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=56
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

    Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms
    yiduzui
        54
    yiduzui  
       2017-11-20 23:35:02 +08:00
    BJLT

    root@ysbots:~# ping 9.9.9.9
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=138 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=142 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=136 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=133 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=144 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=225 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=167 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=137 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    9 packets transmitted, 8 received, 11% packet loss, time 8011ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 133.940/153.500/225.722/29.056 ms
    isCyan
        55
    isCyan  
       2017-11-20 23:36:16 +08:00
    墙外都这么高延迟
    junbaor
        56
    junbaor  
       2017-11-20 23:38:57 +08:00
    root@wkfg-hk:~# ping 9.9.9.9
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=236 time=444 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=236 time=443 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9009ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 443.200/443.517/444.138/0.594 ms
    isCyan
        57
    isCyan  
       2017-11-20 23:39:23 +08:00
    HPING 9.9.9.9 (en7 9.9.9.9): S set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes
    len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=8119 sport=53 flags=RA seq=0 win=0 rtt=411.4 ms
    len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=62439 sport=53 flags=RA seq=2 win=0 rtt=417.7 ms
    len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=10136 sport=53 flags=RA seq=3 win=0 rtt=411.3 ms
    len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=33500 sport=53 flags=RA seq=4 win=0 rtt=411.9 ms

    --- 9.9.9.9 hping statistic ---
    5 packets tramitted, 4 packets received, 20% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 411.3/413.1/417.7 ms
    wql
        58
    wql  
       2017-11-21 00:02:35 +08:00 via Android
    @crystone 这是内网地址啊。阁下实在开玩笑。
    RqPS6rhmP3Nyn3Tm
        59
    RqPS6rhmP3Nyn3Tm  
       2017-11-21 01:30:37 +08:00 via iPad
    我准备推出一个 dns 服务,IP 是 127.0.0.1,各位意向如何?
    Ixizi
        60
    Ixizi  
       2017-11-21 06:50:20 +08:00
    正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=185ms TTL=55
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=182ms TTL=55
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=200ms TTL=55
    来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=182ms TTL=55
    Ixizi
        61
    Ixizi  
       2017-11-21 06:51:19 +08:00
    @BXIA 可以的,我这延迟很低

    PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> ping 127.0.0.1

    正在 Ping 127.0.0.1 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
    来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
    来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
    来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
    Maddox
        62
    Maddox  
       2017-11-21 08:35:30 +08:00
    新加坡

    ~$ ping 9.9.9.9 -c 10
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.54 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=2.63 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2.43 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=2.46 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=2.44 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=2.48 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=2.44 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=2.40 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=2.42 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=2.40 ms

    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.402/2.467/2.634/0.092 ms


    ~$ ping 9.9.9.10 -c 10
    PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.23 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=2.18 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2.10 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=2.13 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=2.20 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=2.13 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=2.17 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=2.08 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=2.18 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=2.15 ms

    --- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.081/2.160/2.236/0.044 ms
    gtanyin
        63
    gtanyin  
       2017-11-21 09:25:22 +08:00
    ➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.9
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=257.501 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=277.032 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=232.272 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=213.685 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 213.685/245.122/277.032/24.109 ms

    ➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.10
    PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=245.710 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=198.417 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=178.391 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=177.102 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=235.692 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 177.102/207.062/245.710/28.663 ms
    yjxjn
        64
    yjxjn  
       2017-11-21 10:13:57 +08:00
    IBM 推的互联网服务,算了,全是垃圾。
    strongcoder
        65
    strongcoder  
       2017-11-21 10:32:16 +08:00
    Last login: Fri Nov 17 16:47:19 on ttys003
    ➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.9
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=327.342 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=347.923 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=248.081 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=306.733 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=330.761 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=247.672 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=247.926 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=249.439 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=249.715 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=250.040 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 13
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=313.979 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=245.275 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=253.463 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=273.494 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 18
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=246.300 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=336.858 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=253.505 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=275.436 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=23 ttl=50 time=243.658 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=24 ttl=50 time=318.290 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=25 ttl=50 time=339.844 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=26 ttl=50 time=257.309 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=27 ttl=50 time=279.605 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=28 ttl=50 time=244.957 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 29
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 30
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 31
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=32 ttl=50 time=280.713 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=33 ttl=50 time=304.152 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=34 ttl=50 time=324.500 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=35 ttl=50 time=243.701 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=36 ttl=50 time=243.540 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=37 ttl=50 time=242.556 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=38 ttl=50 time=242.814 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=39 ttl=50 time=324.518 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 40
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    42 packets transmitted, 32 packets received, 23.8% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 242.556/277.941/347.923/36.288 ms
    ➜ ~
    nVic
        66
    nVic  
       2017-11-21 15:43:19 +08:00
    0.0.0.0 这个 IP 多少钱?
    maojy1989
        67
    maojy1989  
       2017-11-22 09:58:01 +08:00
    然而这个 DNS 对国内来说没什么卵用,防不了污染、CDN 也不友好
    imbahom
        68
    imbahom  
       2017-11-22 10:55:05 +08:00 via iPhone
    6 翻了
    citydog
        69
    citydog  
       2017-12-10 19:16:32 +08:00 via iPhone
    伦敦的?我说这么慢
    ponyxx
        70
    ponyxx  
       2018-01-19 23:11:31 +08:00 via Android
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=22.9 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=36.1 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=27.1 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=9.86 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=25.7 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4250ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.863/24.369/36.116/8.484 ms

    ————————————

    上海阿里云实测
    ponyxx
        71
    ponyxx  
       2018-01-19 23:21:32 +08:00 via Android
    @ponyxx
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=22.9 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=36.1 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=27.1 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=9.86 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=25.7 ms
    ^C
    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4250ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.863/24.369/36.116/8.484 ms

    ————————————

    上海阿里云实测

    ——————————————
    抱歉,发错了,上边这是美国 cn2 实测,以下才是上海阿里云实测

    https://i.loli.net/2018/01/19/5a620ce7c82aa.png
    aliipay
        72
    aliipay  
       2018-02-01 11:54:58 +08:00
    坡县 aws
    ping 9.9.9.9 -c 5
    PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.02 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=1.97 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=1.91 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=1.95 ms
    64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=1.97 ms

    --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.911/1.968/2.026/0.054 ms
    关于   ·   帮助文档   ·   博客   ·   API   ·   FAQ   ·   实用小工具   ·   988 人在线   最高记录 6679   ·     Select Language
    创意工作者们的社区
    World is powered by solitude
    VERSION: 3.9.8.5 · 31ms · UTC 19:53 · PVG 03:53 · LAX 11:53 · JFK 14:53
    Developed with CodeLauncher
    ♥ Do have faith in what you're doing.