1
dyy1997 2017-11-20 10:52:30 +08:00
<blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="a/Yn45M"><a href="//imgur.com/Yn45M"></a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
长城阵亡 |
2
dyy1997 2017-11-20 10:53:49 +08:00
|
4
Troevil 2017-11-20 10:55:53 +08:00
9.9.9.9
9.9.9.10 |
5
killadm 2017-11-20 10:59:17 +08:00
9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 271ms,最长 = 272ms,平均 = 271ms 延迟很高 |
6
kttde 2017-11-20 10:59:32 +08:00
如果支持非 53 端口就还不错
|
7
janus77 2017-11-20 11:00:21 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=163ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=160ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=162ms TTL=49 请求超时。 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 160ms,最长 = 163ms,平均 = 161ms |
8
FONG2 2017-11-20 11:22:57 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=221ms TTL=52 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=52 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 219ms,最长 = 221ms,平均 = 220ms |
9
fruitscandy 2017-11-20 11:25:22 +08:00
Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 77ms |
10
CEBBCAT 2017-11-20 11:28:02 +08:00 via Android
好像是有恶意网站过滤,这是不是也算是污染了?
|
11
sikariba 2017-11-20 11:30:42 +08:00
确实延时很高,我的也 200+ms
|
12
windirt 2017-11-20 12:09:50 +08:00
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=247.287 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=224.672 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=221.834 ms PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=260.780 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=282.291 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=301.803 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=230.136 ms |
13
huanxianghao 2017-11-20 12:12:25 +08:00
延迟很高,深圳电信有 230 左右
|
14
ashfinal 2017-11-20 12:16:43 +08:00
~ % Ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=122.878 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=122.023 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=122.914 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=234.114 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=126.519 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=44 time=123.828 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=44 time=136.924 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 122.023/141.314/234.114/38.184 ms |
15
zane1994 2017-11-20 12:45:06 +08:00 via iPhone
还没有在中国加节点,所以现在并没有什么用
|
17
laudukang 2017-11-20 12:56:53 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=277ms TTL=55 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=270ms TTL=55 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=55 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=304ms TTL=55 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 270ms,最长 = 304ms,平均 = 286ms 正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=28ms TTL=44 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=25ms TTL=44 请求超时。 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=34ms TTL=44 8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 25ms,最长 = 34ms,平均 = 29ms |
19
shingoxray 2017-11-20 12:59:46 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 76ms,最长 = 76ms,平均 = 76ms 正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=83ms TTL=50 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=84ms TTL=50 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=84ms TTL=50 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=83ms TTL=50 8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 83ms,最长 = 84ms,平均 = 83ms |
20
roychan 2017-11-20 13:03:14 +08:00
我准备推出一下 0.0.0.0。
|
21
ihainan 2017-11-20 13:08:26 +08:00
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=53.8 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=55.5 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=54.6 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=53.7 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=53.7 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=54.5 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=54.8 ms |
22
cooLepus 2017-11-20 13:11:09 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 197ms,最长 = 197ms,平均 = 197ms 正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44 来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44 8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 21ms,最长 = 21ms,平均 = 21ms 广州电信 |
23
niceworld 2017-11-20 13:11:40 +08:00 3
@roychan 真正的 0 延迟,无论您在世界的任何一个角落,都能享受到高度可定制化与无延迟的 DNS 服务。 🐶
|
24
scriptB0y 2017-11-20 13:21:17 +08:00
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=68.918 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=67.911 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=69.325 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=67.352 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=69.292 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=68.051 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=68.397 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=67.392 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=67.974 ms |
25
joy281 2017-11-20 13:27:48 +08:00
> ping 9.9.9.9
Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=54 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 49ms, Maximum = 57ms, Average = 51ms |
26
DOLLOR 2017-11-20 13:35:48 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=283ms TTL=50 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=285ms TTL=50 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=289ms TTL=50 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=284ms TTL=50 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 283ms,最长 = 289ms,平均 = 285ms 这延迟确实惨不忍睹 |
27
wclebb 2017-11-20 14:03:00 +08:00
211ms
|
28
raysonx 2017-11-20 14:10:50 +08:00 1
北京联通,ping 不通。
路由追踪结果显示空路由: Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 192.168.1.1 0.0% 6 6.6 8.9 1.8 22.3 8.4 2. 221.223.*.* 0.0% 6 10.7 15.4 6.8 32.3 9.8 3. 61.148.174.53 0.0% 6 24.3 8.7 4.9 24.3 7.6 4. 61.51.114.189 66.7% 6 7.9 8.3 7.9 8.8 0.0 5. 124.65.194.157 33.3% 6 4.1 22.4 4.1 72.7 33.6 6. 219.158.5.150 0.0% 6 6.8 11.7 6.8 16.4 3.0 7. 219.158.3.178 0.0% 6 8.2 10.4 6.5 15.9 3.5 8. ??? |
29
chanssl 2017-11-20 14:26:42 +08:00
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
119 packets transmitted, 101 received, 15% packet loss, time 117996ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.031/193.450/277.754/33.227 ms --- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics --- 114 packets transmitted, 104 received, 8% packet loss, time 113047ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 150.006/200.296/278.582/39.471 ms |
30
UnderTakerMS 2017-11-20 14:28:12 +08:00
根据站长之家的测试评论访问时间在 200ms 以上
|
31
funnypc 2017-11-20 17:56:28 +08:00 via Android
|
33
Northn 2017-11-20 18:14:29 +08:00
|
34
WAITUNG 2017-11-20 18:24:29 +08:00
190ms
|
35
flyingghost 2017-11-20 18:29:18 +08:00
魔都电信
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 67.873/74.915/127.671/14.395 ms --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- 21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 63.755/64.835/66.484/0.835 ms |
36
v2eros 2017-11-20 18:55:50 +08:00
太高了,250-350 之间
|
37
Lxxyx 2017-11-20 18:57:21 +08:00
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=414.808 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=333.716 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=355.080 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=378.428 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=402.134 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 333.716/376.833/414.808/29.722 ms |
38
ghostsf 2017-11-20 18:58:47 +08:00 via Android
延迟有点高
|
39
Kimyx 2017-11-20 19:27:11 +08:00
9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 73,已接收 = 73,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 202ms,最长 = 209ms,平均 = 204ms |
40
jiangzhuo 2017-11-20 19:54:32 +08:00
我准备推出 10.10.10.10
|
41
hfenger 2017-11-20 20:36:32 +08:00
海外
...... 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 10,已接收 = 10,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 42ms,最长 = 42ms,平均 = 42ms 北京 ...... 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=204ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=194ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=199ms TTL=49 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 24,已接收 = 24,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 175ms,最长 = 204ms,平均 = 181ms |
42
crystone 2017-11-20 20:39:52 +08:00
你们试一下 10.10.10.10
|
43
powergx 2017-11-20 21:02:20 +08:00
dig google.com @9.9.9.9
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> google.com @9.9.9.9 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 57060 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;google.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.138 google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.102 google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.139 google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.113 google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.100 google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.101 ;; Query time: 168 msec ;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 20 21:01:23 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 124 |
44
erlinux 2017-11-20 21:20:53 +08:00
上海移动
Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=54 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=186ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 180ms, Maximum = 186ms, Average = 182ms |
45
beautifultable 2017-11-20 21:25:32 +08:00
ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=91.484 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=92.072 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=91.556 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=91.779 ms --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 91.484/91.723/92.072/0.229 ms |
46
testcaoy7 2017-11-20 21:42:05 +08:00 via Android
我这边延迟 63 毫秒
|
47
jimzhong 2017-11-20 21:55:01 +08:00
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=21.4 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=19.0 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=21.8 ms |
48
dot 2017-11-20 21:59:43 +08:00 via Android
没有 anycast,靓号也没用吧……
|
49
vimutt 2017-11-20 22:22:04 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 142ms,最长 = 142ms,平均 = 142ms |
50
xern 2017-11-20 22:27:42 +08:00 via Android
台湾 中华电信
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=107.505 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=106.888 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=107.236 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=107.872 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=106.775 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=107.330 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=107.017 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 106.775/107.232/107.872/0.352 ms |
51
cloverzrg2 2017-11-20 22:36:14 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
请求超时。 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 333ms,最长 = 333ms,平均 = 333ms |
52
fanyuxi 2017-11-20 23:12:47 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=243ms TTL=53 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=265ms TTL=53 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=256ms TTL=53 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=275ms TTL=53 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 243ms,最长 = 275ms,平均 = 259ms |
53
hallomou 2017-11-20 23:24:43 +08:00
Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=56 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=56 Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56 Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms |
54
yiduzui 2017-11-20 23:35:02 +08:00
BJLT
root@ysbots:~# ping 9.9.9.9 PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=138 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=142 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=136 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=133 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=144 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=225 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=167 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=137 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 9 packets transmitted, 8 received, 11% packet loss, time 8011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 133.940/153.500/225.722/29.056 ms |
55
isCyan 2017-11-20 23:36:16 +08:00
墙外都这么高延迟
|
56
junbaor 2017-11-20 23:38:57 +08:00
root@wkfg-hk:~# ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=236 time=444 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=236 time=443 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=236 time=443 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9009ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 443.200/443.517/444.138/0.594 ms |
57
isCyan 2017-11-20 23:39:23 +08:00
HPING 9.9.9.9 (en7 9.9.9.9): S set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes
len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=8119 sport=53 flags=RA seq=0 win=0 rtt=411.4 ms len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=62439 sport=53 flags=RA seq=2 win=0 rtt=417.7 ms len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=10136 sport=53 flags=RA seq=3 win=0 rtt=411.3 ms len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=33500 sport=53 flags=RA seq=4 win=0 rtt=411.9 ms --- 9.9.9.9 hping statistic --- 5 packets tramitted, 4 packets received, 20% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 411.3/413.1/417.7 ms |
59
RqPS6rhmP3Nyn3Tm 2017-11-21 01:30:37 +08:00 via iPad
我准备推出一个 dns 服务,IP 是 127.0.0.1,各位意向如何?
|
60
Ixizi 2017-11-21 06:50:20 +08:00
正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=185ms TTL=55 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=182ms TTL=55 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=200ms TTL=55 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=182ms TTL=55 |
61
Ixizi 2017-11-21 06:51:19 +08:00
@BXIA 可以的,我这延迟很低
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> ping 127.0.0.1 正在 Ping 127.0.0.1 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64 来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64 来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64 来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64 |
62
Maddox 2017-11-21 08:35:30 +08:00
新加坡
~$ ping 9.9.9.9 -c 10 PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.54 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=2.63 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2.43 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=2.46 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=2.44 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=2.48 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=2.44 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=2.40 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=2.42 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=2.40 ms --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.402/2.467/2.634/0.092 ms ~$ ping 9.9.9.10 -c 10 PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.23 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=2.18 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2.10 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=2.13 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=2.20 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=2.13 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=2.17 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=2.08 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=2.18 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=2.15 ms --- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.081/2.160/2.236/0.044 ms |
63
gtanyin 2017-11-21 09:25:22 +08:00
➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=257.501 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=277.032 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=232.272 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=213.685 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 213.685/245.122/277.032/24.109 ms ➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.10 PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=245.710 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=198.417 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=178.391 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=177.102 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=235.692 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 177.102/207.062/245.710/28.663 ms |
64
yjxjn 2017-11-21 10:13:57 +08:00
IBM 推的互联网服务,算了,全是垃圾。
|
65
strongcoder 2017-11-21 10:32:16 +08:00
Last login: Fri Nov 17 16:47:19 on ttys003
➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.9 PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=327.342 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=347.923 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=248.081 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=306.733 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=330.761 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=247.672 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=247.926 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=249.439 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=249.715 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 10 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=250.040 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 12 Request timeout for icmp_seq 13 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=313.979 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=245.275 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=253.463 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=273.494 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 18 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=246.300 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=336.858 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=253.505 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=275.436 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=23 ttl=50 time=243.658 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=24 ttl=50 time=318.290 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=25 ttl=50 time=339.844 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=26 ttl=50 time=257.309 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=27 ttl=50 time=279.605 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=28 ttl=50 time=244.957 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 29 Request timeout for icmp_seq 30 Request timeout for icmp_seq 31 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=32 ttl=50 time=280.713 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=33 ttl=50 time=304.152 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=34 ttl=50 time=324.500 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=35 ttl=50 time=243.701 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=36 ttl=50 time=243.540 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=37 ttl=50 time=242.556 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=38 ttl=50 time=242.814 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=39 ttl=50 time=324.518 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 40 ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 42 packets transmitted, 32 packets received, 23.8% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 242.556/277.941/347.923/36.288 ms ➜ ~ |
66
nVic 2017-11-21 15:43:19 +08:00
0.0.0.0 这个 IP 多少钱?
|
67
maojy1989 2017-11-22 09:58:01 +08:00
然而这个 DNS 对国内来说没什么卵用,防不了污染、CDN 也不友好
|
68
imbahom 2017-11-22 10:55:05 +08:00 via iPhone
6 翻了
|
69
citydog 2017-12-10 19:16:32 +08:00 via iPhone
伦敦的?我说这么慢
|
70
ponyxx 2018-01-19 23:11:31 +08:00 via Android
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=22.9 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=36.1 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=27.1 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=9.86 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=25.7 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4250ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.863/24.369/36.116/8.484 ms ———————————— 上海阿里云实测 |
71
ponyxx 2018-01-19 23:21:32 +08:00 via Android
@ponyxx
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=22.9 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=36.1 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=27.1 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=9.86 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=25.7 ms ^C --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4250ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.863/24.369/36.116/8.484 ms ———————————— 上海阿里云实测 —————————————— 抱歉,发错了,上边这是美国 cn2 实测,以下才是上海阿里云实测 https://i.loli.net/2018/01/19/5a620ce7c82aa.png |
72
aliipay 2018-02-01 11:54:58 +08:00
坡县 aws
ping 9.9.9.9 -c 5 PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.02 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=1.97 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=1.91 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=1.95 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=1.97 ms --- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.911/1.968/2.026/0.054 ms |